<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Becta reported to EU on Learning Platform framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2007/01/09/becta-reported-to-eu-on-learning-platform-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2007/01/09/becta-reported-to-eu-on-learning-platform-framework/</link>
	<description>In 1992, I was involved in an exciting ICT and learning conference with this title. I'm assuming that Steve Heppell, who was one of the main organisers for the conference, came up with this phrase to express the theme of the conference. Although a great deal has happened in education since, we've still got a long way to go to make this question irrelevant.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crispin Weston</title>
		<link>http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2007/01/09/becta-reported-to-eu-on-learning-platform-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispin Weston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2007/01/09/becta-reported-to-eu-on-learning-platform-framework/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Hello John,

We did not apply for the framework because we did not meet the financial criteria which prevented small companies entering the competition. Our argument, also being made by the open-source community and backed by 100 MPs in the House of Commons, is that if you want innovation, you should be encouraging small companies deploying niche products. The standards for interoperability, (the mandatory requirements not enforced by Becta) are essential to smaller companies deploying niche products which need nevertheless to interoperate with software running in different parts of the school.

Crispin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John,</p>
<p>We did not apply for the framework because we did not meet the financial criteria which prevented small companies entering the competition. Our argument, also being made by the open-source community and backed by 100 MPs in the House of Commons, is that if you want innovation, you should be encouraging small companies deploying niche products. The standards for interoperability, (the mandatory requirements not enforced by Becta) are essential to smaller companies deploying niche products which need nevertheless to interoperate with software running in different parts of the school.</p>
<p>Crispin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john sutton</title>
		<link>http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2007/01/09/becta-reported-to-eu-on-learning-platform-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>john sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2007/01/09/becta-reported-to-eu-on-learning-platform-framework/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Do I take it that Alpha Learning did not apply as they felt that they did not meet some of the mandatory criteria?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I take it that Alpha Learning did not apply as they felt that they did not meet some of the mandatory criteria?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
