<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many steps does it take to recognise &#8216;progression&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2008/11/27/how-many-steps-does-it-take-to-recognise-progression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://advisorymatters.naaceblogs.org/2008/11/27/how-many-steps-does-it-take-to-recognise-progression/</link>
	<description>In 1992, I was involved in an exciting ICT and learning conference with this title. I'm assuming that Steve Heppell, who was one of the main organisers for the conference, came up with this phrase to express the theme of the conference. Although a great deal has happened in education since, we've still got a long way to go to make this question irrelevant.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>
